Quote:
Originally Posted by strawberryshortcake
I just wanted to point one thing out first, being tazed in fact can be harmful even in young populations.
If you have a pre-existing cardiovascular condition such as an arrhythmia (e.g. chronic atrial fibrillation, etc), the added electrical shock wave has the potential, but not guaranteed, to do harm.
|
That is true, I have designed them before BUT consider the alternatives and what they might do to your body (mace, nightstick, punches, etc....) I think they basically have to choose the "lesser evil" to use on the guy.
I agree with Infinite42, Cutup and Sultry. +1s to those opinions, -1s to many others.
The guy was being disruptive, that is NOT freedom of speech to be disruptive, he needed to grow up and take responsbility for his actions. His MANNER of speaking was not respectful, if you want freedom of speech to say what you want, then do it RESPECTFULLY!
He deserved to be tasered in my opinion.